Landmark Case Highlights Data Privacy Concerns as Court Orders Disclosure of IP Address Holder
New York, NY – September 10, 2025 – In a significant development that underscores the ongoing tension between copyright enforcement and online privacy, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York has ordered the disclosure of identifying information for a subscriber associated with the IP address 74.101.99.74. The ruling, issued in the case of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 74.101.99.74, marks a notable step in the legal pursuit of alleged copyright infringement in the digital age.
The case, filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, a company known for its involvement in the enforcement of copyrights related to adult entertainment, centers on allegations of unauthorized downloading and distribution of copyrighted material. Strike 3 Holdings sought a court order to compel an Internet Service Provider (ISP) to reveal the identity of the individual or entity linked to the specific IP address in question.
Courts have grappled with such requests for years, balancing the rights of copyright holders to protect their intellectual property against the privacy expectations of internet users. In this instance, the Eastern District of New York has authorized the disclosure, suggesting that the plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence to warrant the identification of the subscriber.
While the specific details of the evidence presented by Strike 3 Holdings are not fully elaborated in the public docket entry, such orders are typically granted when there is a reasonable basis to believe that copyright infringement has occurred and that the IP address in question can be directly linked to that infringement. The process often involves establishing a chain of evidence, potentially including logs from the plaintiff demonstrating the alleged infringement from the specified IP address.
The issuance of this order does not inherently mean that copyright infringement has been definitively proven. Rather, it is a procedural step that allows the plaintiff to identify the potential infringer and proceed with further legal action if warranted. The disclosed information will likely be used by Strike 3 Holdings to determine whether to name a specific individual or entity as a defendant in their lawsuit and to seek damages or injunctive relief for the alleged violation of their copyrights.
This case serves as a reminder to internet users about the potential consequences of engaging in copyright infringement. While IP addresses themselves do not directly identify individuals, ISPs maintain records that link IP addresses to their subscribers. Court orders, such as the one issued in this case, can compel ISPs to provide this information to rights holders.
Legal experts anticipate that this ruling may encourage similar actions by other copyright holders seeking to combat online piracy. The ongoing evolution of digital technologies and online behavior continues to shape legal precedent, and cases like Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 74.101.99.74 will undoubtedly contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding digital rights, data privacy, and intellectual property protection in the internet era.
25-3089 – Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 74.101.99.74
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
govinfo.gov District CourtEastern District of New York published ’25-3089 – Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 74.101.99.74′ at 2025-09-10 22:11. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.