Unmasking the Digital Footprint: Court Orders Disclosure in Copyright Infringement Case
Brooklyn, NY – In a significant development for copyright holders and internet users alike, a recent order from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has shed light on the ongoing efforts to identify individuals suspected of copyright infringement. The court has authorized the disclosure of subscriber information linked to a specific IP address, a move that could have wide-ranging implications for the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the digital age.
The case, formally known as Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 100.33.82.27, was published on govinfo.gov on September 10, 2025. At its core, the litigation involves allegations of copyright infringement brought by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. The plaintiff asserts that its copyrighted material was illegally distributed or accessed by a user associated with the IP address 100.33.82.27.
In many such digital copyright cases, the initial step for a plaintiff is to identify the subscriber associated with the infringing IP address. Internet service providers (ISPs) are typically the custodians of this information. However, privacy concerns and legal frameworks often necessitate a court order to compel an ISP to release subscriber details to a rights holder. This latest order signifies that Strike 3 Holdings, LLC has met the legal threshold required by the court to obtain such information.
While the specifics of the copyrighted material in question are not detailed in the public record of this particular order, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC is known for its involvement in copyright enforcement related to adult entertainment content. The company has a history of pursuing legal action against alleged infringers across various jurisdictions.
The court’s decision to grant the disclosure order reflects a balancing act between the rights of copyright holders to protect their intellectual property and the privacy expectations of internet users. Such orders are typically granted when there is sufficient evidence presented to suggest a legitimate claim of infringement. The process often involves a “John Doe” lawsuit, a legal mechanism used when the identity of the defendant is unknown at the outset of litigation.
For internet users, this development serves as a reminder of the digital trails they leave and the potential consequences of engaging in activities that may infringe upon copyright laws. While the court’s order is specific to this IP address and this particular case, it underscores the increasing effectiveness of legal avenues available to copyright owners seeking to address online infringement.
It is important to note that the issuance of this order does not equate to a finding of guilt. It is a procedural step that allows the plaintiff to move forward with identifying the alleged infringer. The individual identified through the subscriber information will then have the opportunity to respond to the allegations made against them.
The Eastern District of New York, a prominent federal court, continues to play a role in shaping the legal landscape of digital copyright enforcement. This case, and others like it, will undoubtedly continue to inform the ongoing dialogue about online privacy, intellectual property rights, and the responsibilities of internet users in the digital age.
25-2490 – Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 100.33.82.27
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
govinfo.gov District CourtEastern District of New York published ’25-2490 – Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 100.33.82.27′ at 2025-09-10 22:11. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.