Here’s a detailed article about H.J. Res. 104 (IH), presented in a polite tone with relevant information:
Congress Considers Disapproving Bureau of Land Management Rule on Miles City Resource Management Plan
A significant legislative action is underway in the United States Congress concerning a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the Miles City Field Office. House Joint Resolution 104 (IH), introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to provide for congressional disapproval of this rule under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code. The resolution was published on the official federal repository, govinfo.gov, on July 11, 2025, at 05:08.
At its core, H.J. Res. 104 is a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution. The CRA provides Congress with a mechanism to review, and potentially overturn, regulations issued by federal agencies. If a CRA resolution is passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and is subsequently signed by the President, it nullifies the agency’s rule. If the President vetoes the resolution, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers.
The rule in question pertains to the Miles City Field Office’s Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. Resource Management Plans (RMPs) are comprehensive land use plans developed by the BLM that guide the management of public lands within a specific area. These plans address a wide range of activities, including land use, resource extraction, conservation, recreation, and more, aiming to balance diverse interests and ensure the sustainable use of public resources.
The specifics of the BLM’s submitted rule for the Miles City Field Office are not detailed in the provided information, but its nature as an “Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment” suggests it modifies an existing RMP or establishes new management directives for the lands overseen by the Miles City Field Office. Such amendments can be triggered by new information, changes in land use needs, or evolving policy objectives.
The introduction of H.J. Res. 104 signifies that members of Congress have reviewed the BLM’s rule and have concerns regarding its content, potential impacts, or the process by which it was developed. Congressional disapproval under the CRA typically arises when legislators believe a rule is overly burdensome, exceeds the agency’s statutory authority, is not based on sound science, or has significant negative economic or environmental consequences.
The legislative process for H.J. Res. 104 will involve debate and potential amendments in the House of Representatives, followed by consideration in the Senate. The outcome of this resolution will have direct implications for the management of public lands within the Miles City Field Office’s jurisdiction, influencing how these lands are utilized and protected for years to come. Stakeholders, including industry groups, environmental organizations, local communities, and the public, will likely be closely following the proceedings as they unfold.
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
www.govinfo.gov published ‘H.J. Res. 104 (IH) – Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment.’ at 2025-07-11 05:08. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.