Landmark Case on Horizon: SHIVER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Heads to the Court of Federal Claims,govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims


Landmark Case on Horizon: SHIVER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Heads to the Court of Federal Claims

A significant legal development is anticipated on September 10, 2025, with the United States Court of Federal Claims set to publish details of the case SHIVER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, case number 1:21-vv-01961. This case, originating from filings in 2021, promises to shed light on important legal questions concerning the intersection of health services and federal responsibilities.

While the specific details of the case remain under wraps until the official publication date, the title itself suggests a matter of considerable public interest. The inclusion of the “vv” designation in the case number often points to proceedings related to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, a federal law designed to compensate individuals who have been injured by certain childhood vaccines.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This program provides a no-fault alternative to traditional legal action for individuals who claim to have suffered a vaccine injury. It is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Secretary of Health and Human Services is typically the named respondent in these proceedings, representing the government’s interests in the VICP.

Cases brought before the Court of Federal Claims under the VICP involve petitions for compensation from individuals who allege that they or their children sustained a vaccine-related injury following administration of a covered vaccine. These claims are evaluated by a Special Master, who reviews medical records, expert testimony, and other evidence to determine if a petition meets the legal criteria for compensation. This often involves complex scientific and medical assessments to establish a causal link between the vaccine and the alleged injury.

The involvement of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in this case underscores the government’s role in overseeing and defending the integrity of the VICP. The Court of Federal Claims plays a crucial role in adjudicating these claims, ensuring fair consideration for petitioners while also upholding the provisions of the Vaccine Injury Act.

As the publication date of September 10, 2025, approaches, the legal community and the public will be keenly awaiting further information regarding the specifics of SHIVER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. The proceedings are likely to involve intricate legal arguments and expert evaluations, contributing to the ongoing discourse surrounding vaccine safety and the mechanisms in place to address potential adverse events. This case represents an important facet of the government’s commitment to public health and its responsiveness to individuals who may have been affected by vaccine administration.


1:21-vv-01961 – SHIVER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims published ‘1:21-vv-01961 – SHIVER v. SE CRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES’ at 2025-09-10 21:07. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment