Landmark Case in Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Samuels v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Reaches Federal Court of Claims,govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims


Landmark Case in Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Samuels v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Reaches Federal Court of Claims

Washington D.C. – The United States Court of Federal Claims has recently published details regarding a significant case, Samuels v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, identified by the docket number 1:21-vv-00350. This legal proceeding, concerning the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), reached a notable publication milestone on September 6, 2025, at 8:52 PM Eastern Time, according to information available on GovInfo.gov.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established in 1986, provides a pathway for individuals who have suffered serious side effects from covered vaccines to receive compensation. This program operates as an alternative to traditional lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers or healthcare providers. The Court of Federal Claims plays a crucial role in adjudicating claims filed under this program.

While the specific details of the Samuels v. Secretary of Health and Human Services case are not fully elaborated in the initial publication notice, the nature of the case as a “vv” filing within the Court of Federal Claims system strongly suggests it pertains to a claim filed under the VICP. These filings are typically initiated by individuals, or their legal representatives, who allege they or a family member have experienced an injury or death determined to be a direct result of a covered vaccine.

The publication of this case on GovInfo.gov signifies that it has progressed to a stage where court documents are being formally recorded and made accessible to the public. This allows interested parties, including legal professionals, researchers, and the general public, to track the proceedings and understand the legal arguments and evidence being presented.

The VICP process can be complex, often involving medical reviews, expert testimony, and legal analysis to determine whether a causal link exists between a vaccination and the alleged injury. The court’s involvement in cases like Samuels v. Secretary of Health and Human Services underscores the commitment to a thorough and fair examination of each claim.

Further updates on the Samuels v. Secretary of Health and Human Services case will likely become available as the litigation progresses through the Court of Federal Claims. Individuals seeking to understand the details of this case or the broader workings of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are encouraged to consult official government resources such as GovInfo.gov. The ongoing proceedings in this case contribute to the body of jurisprudence surrounding vaccine safety and compensation, a vital aspect of public health policy in the United States.


1:21-vv-00350 – SAMUELS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims published ‘1:21-vv-00350 – SAMUELS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES’ at 20 25-09-06 20:52. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment