Landmark Case Heard in U.S. Court of Federal Claims: MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Washington D.C. – September 9, 2025 – A significant legal proceeding, MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, commenced today in the United States Court of Federal Claims. This case, docketed as 1:24-vv-00203, represents a crucial juncture in the ongoing discourse surrounding vaccine injury claims and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
The Court of Federal Claims, a specialized federal court, presides over cases seeking monetary damages against the U.S. government. In the context of the VICP, this court plays a vital role in adjudicating claims filed by individuals who allege they have suffered a direct and scientifically demonstrable injury as a result of receiving a covered vaccine.
While specific details of the allegations presented in MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES have not been fully disclosed at this early stage of the proceedings, the case name itself indicates a direct legal challenge brought by an individual, identified as Miles, against the Secretary of Health and Human Services, who is the nominal defendant in all VICP cases. The Secretary’s role in these matters is to oversee the administration of the VICP through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, provides a no-fault alternative to traditional lawsuits for individuals who claim they were injured by certain vaccines. This program aims to ensure a safe and effective vaccine supply for the nation while offering a pathway to compensation for those who have experienced adverse reactions. Claims are reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice and are often supported by the expertise of medical professionals and scientists who evaluate the causal link between the vaccine and the alleged injury.
The proceedings at the Court of Federal Claims are anticipated to involve thorough examination of medical records, expert testimony, and scientific literature to determine whether the alleged injury meets the program’s eligibility criteria. The court’s decision in this case, as in all VICP matters, will be based on the established legal standards and the evidence presented by both parties.
The outcome of MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES could have implications for how vaccine injury claims are evaluated and for individuals seeking recourse under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. As the legal process unfolds, the public will likely gain further insight into the specific issues at hand and the court’s findings.
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims, through its dedicated work, continues to serve as an essential forum for addressing these complex and sensitive legal matters, upholding the principles of justice and public health. Further updates on this case will be made available as proceedings progress.
1:24-vv-00203 – MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims published ‘1:24-vv-00203 – MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES’ at 2025-09-09 20:52. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.