A New Chapter in Vaccine Injury Litigation: Torres-Barrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services,govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims


A New Chapter in Vaccine Injury Litigation: Torres-Barrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Washington D.C. – A significant legal development is emerging from the United States Court of Federal Claims, with the publication of a new case titled “Torres-Barrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.” Filed and documented on September 9, 2025, at 20:52 Eastern Time, this case, bearing the identifier 1:23-vv-01295, marks another step in the ongoing proceedings within the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established in 1986, serves as a vital avenue for individuals who have suffered serious adverse effects from covered vaccines. This program offers a no-fault alternative to traditional lawsuits, aiming to provide compensation for proven vaccine injuries. The Court of Federal Claims plays a crucial role in adjudicating these claims, ensuring that eligible petitioners receive the support they may require.

While the specific details of the allegations made by Ms. Torres-Barrera are not yet fully elaborated in the initial publication, the filing of a new case within the NVICP framework signifies an individual’s pursuit of recourse under the program. These cases often involve extensive medical documentation and expert testimony to establish a link between a vaccine and a subsequent injury.

The judicial process within the NVICP is designed to be thorough and fair. Petitioners must present evidence demonstrating that they received a covered vaccine, that they suffered a significant injury, and that there is a temporal relationship between the vaccination and the onset of the injury. The Secretary of Health and Human Services, represented by the Department of Justice, is the respondent in these proceedings.

The publication of this case by govinfo.gov, the official repository for U.S. government information, ensures transparency and public access to the legal process. It allows for the tracking of proceedings and provides valuable insights into the types of cases being considered by the Court of Federal Claims within the vaccine injury context.

As this case, Torres-Barrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, moves forward, it will undoubtedly be subject to further legal review and potential hearings. The outcome of such cases can have broad implications, contributing to the body of knowledge surrounding vaccine safety and the administration of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The legal community and the public alike will be observing these developments with interest, as they underscore the commitment to addressing vaccine injury claims within a structured and regulated system.


1:23-vv-01295 – TORRES-BARRERA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims published ‘1:23-vv-01295 – TORRES-BARRERA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES’ at 2025-09-09 20:52. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment