Government Records Management Takes Center Stage as House Report on Departmental Dispositions Released,govinfo.gov Congressional SerialSet


Government Records Management Takes Center Stage as House Report on Departmental Dispositions Released

Washington D.C. – September 12, 2025 – A significant development in the ongoing management of federal records has been announced today with the public release of House Report 78-5, titled “Disposition of Records – Sundry Government Departments.” This report, officially committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed on January 14, 1943, has been made accessible through the GovInfo.gov Congressional Serial Set.

The release of this historical document offers valuable insights into the considerations and practices surrounding the disposition of records within various government departments during a pivotal period in American history. While the report dates back to the early 1940s, its principles and the challenges it addresses regarding the organization, preservation, and eventual disposal of governmental information remain remarkably relevant to contemporary record-keeping efforts.

House Report 78-5 likely delves into the critical need for systematic approaches to managing the vast amount of documentation generated by federal agencies. In an era preceding widespread digitization, the physical storage and accessibility of these records would have presented substantial logistical hurdles. The report’s commitment to the Committee of the Whole suggests a thorough review and discussion of proposed policies or actions concerning how records were to be handled across a range of government bodies.

The term “sundry government departments” indicates that the report’s scope was broad, encompassing the record-keeping practices of multiple agencies. This suggests an effort to establish a more unified or standardized approach to departmental record management, aiming for efficiency and accountability. Such a comprehensive review would have been crucial for ensuring that valuable historical documents were preserved while also addressing the need to deaccession obsolete or redundant information.

The directive to be “ordered to be printed” signifies that the findings and recommendations within House Report 78-5 were deemed important enough for wider dissemination and consideration by members of Congress. This process would have allowed for further debate, potential amendments, and ultimately, informed decision-making on legislative or administrative actions related to government records.

While the specific details of the report’s contents are yet to be fully explored by the public, its re-emergence through GovInfo.gov provides researchers, historians, archivists, and government officials with a valuable resource. It offers a window into the evolution of federal record-keeping practices and highlights the enduring importance of sound archival principles. As government operations continue to expand and the volume of information generated grows exponentially, understanding the historical context of record management, as presented in documents like House Report 78-5, can offer crucial lessons for navigating the complexities of information stewardship in the 21st century. The accessibility of such historical documents through platforms like GovInfo.gov underscores the commitment to transparency and the preservation of governmental knowledge for generations to come.


H. Rept. 78-5 – Disposition of records – sundry government departments. January 14, 1943. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov Congressional SerialSet published ‘H. Rept. 78-5 – Disposition of records – sundry government departments. January 14, 1943. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed’ at 2025-09-12 17:22. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment