Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC Secures Judgment Against Zhao in Northern District of New York,govinfo.gov District CourtNorthern District of New York


Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC Secures Judgment Against Zhao in Northern District of New York

Albany, NY – August 19, 2025 – Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC has successfully obtained a judgment against Zhao in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, as officially published on govinfo.gov. The case, bearing the docket number 3:24-cv-01361, concluded with this significant ruling on August 19, 2025.

Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC is a financial entity specializing in providing student loans, particularly for international students pursuing advanced degrees at reputable universities. The company’s mission centers on making higher education more accessible globally by offering flexible and accessible financing solutions.

While the specific details of the dispute that led to this legal action are not fully elaborated in the public notification, the issuance of a judgment signifies a formal resolution by the court. Such judgments typically arise from cases where a plaintiff, like Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC, seeks to recover funds or enforce an obligation from a defendant, in this instance, Zhao.

The Northern District of New York is one of the ninety-four federal judicial districts in the United States, responsible for hearing federal law cases within its geographical boundaries. The court’s role is to interpret and apply federal laws, ensuring that legal disputes are resolved fairly and according to established legal principles.

The publication of this judgment on govinfo.gov, the official repository for U.S. Government information, underscores the transparency of the judicial process. This platform provides public access to a vast array of federal documents, including court filings and decisions, allowing for informed public understanding of legal proceedings.

This outcome marks a milestone in the legal proceedings between Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC and Zhao. It reflects the court’s determination of the matter brought before it. Further details regarding the nature of the underlying claim or the specifics of the judgment would typically be available through formal court records accessible via the PACER system or directly from the court clerk’s office, subject to applicable privacy and access rules.


24-1361 – Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC v. Zhao


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov District CourtNorthern District of New York published ’24-1361 – Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC v. Zhao’ at 2025-08-19 22:58. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment