District Court of New Jersey Issues Ruling in Abdur-Raheem v. New Jersey Department of Corrections et al.,govinfo.gov District CourtDistrict of New Jersey


Please note: I am unable to access external websites, including the specific URL provided. Therefore, I cannot retrieve the details of the case “ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al” from govinfo.gov.

However, I can provide you with a template for a detailed article about a court case, which you can then populate with the specific information once you have it.


District Court of New Jersey Issues Ruling in Abdur-Raheem v. New Jersey Department of Corrections et al.

Newark, NJ – [Date of Article] – The District Court of New Jersey has issued a ruling in the case of Abdur-Raheem v. New Jersey Department of Corrections et al., a matter that has been under consideration by the court. The decision, published on August 9, 2025, at 20:45, marks a significant development in this ongoing legal proceeding.

The case, identified by the court docket number 3:15-cv-01743, was filed in the District of New Jersey. While the precise nature of the claims and the specifics of the court’s ruling are detailed within the official filing, cases involving parties such as the New Jersey Department of Corrections and individuals like Abdur-Raheem often pertain to a range of issues within the correctional system and prisoner rights. These can include, but are not limited to, claims of unconstitutional conditions of confinement, due process violations, First Amendment rights, or other grievances related to an individual’s incarceration.

The District Court of New Jersey serves as a crucial venue for addressing legal disputes involving federal law and constitutional matters within the state. Its decisions play a vital role in shaping the application of laws and ensuring the protection of individual rights.

Further details regarding the specific claims presented by the plaintiff, Abdur-Raheem, the arguments put forth by the defendants, the New Jersey Department of Corrections and any other named parties, and the court’s reasoning behind its decision can be found within the full published document. Access to these documents allows for a comprehensive understanding of the legal arguments and the court’s interpretation of applicable statutes and precedents.

Individuals interested in the specifics of this case are encouraged to consult the official publication on govinfo.gov for the complete text of the court’s order and opinion. This will provide the most accurate and in-depth information regarding this recent judicial development.


To make this article specific to your needs, please provide me with the following information from the govinfo.gov link:

  • The core issue(s) of the lawsuit: What were the main allegations or claims made by Abdur-Raheem?
  • The specific ruling of the court: Did the court grant or deny motions? Did it rule in favor of the plaintiff or the defendants? What was the outcome of the case (e.g., dismissal, summary judgment, trial order)?
  • Any key arguments or reasoning from the court’s opinion: What were the most important points the judge(s) considered?
  • The nature of the defendants: Were there other defendants besides the New Jersey Department of Corrections?
  • The date the ruling was published: You’ve provided this (August 9, 2025), but confirmation is good.

Once you provide these details, I can create a much more informative and tailored article.


15-1743 – ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov District CourtDistrict of New Jersey published ’15-1743 – ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al’ at 2025-08-09 20:45. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment