New Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Philips Over Sleep Apnea Devices
A new class action lawsuit has been filed against Koninklijke Philips N.V. and its subsidiaries, alleging widespread issues with the company’s continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machines, as well as ventilators. The lawsuit, officially titled Yu v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on August 1, 2025, with the docket number 2:21-cv-01428.
This legal action follows a significant recall issued by Philips in June 2021, concerning a specific type of polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam used in many of its respiratory devices. Philips acknowledged that this foam could degrade over time, potentially releasing small particles into the device’s air pathway, which could then be inhaled or ingested by users. Concerns have been raised about potential health risks associated with such exposure, including irritation, respiratory issues, and even more serious long-term health consequences.
The class action complaint, brought forth by lead plaintiff Jian Yu, aims to represent a broader group of individuals who have allegedly suffered harm as a result of using these recalled Philips devices. The lawsuit outlines various claims, which often include allegations of product liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and deceptive trade practices. Plaintiffs in such cases typically seek compensation for damages incurred, which can include the cost of replacement devices, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other related losses.
Philips has previously stated that it is committed to addressing the issues raised by the recall and has been working to remediate the situation, including efforts to resume production of replacement devices and to provide testing and repair services. However, the filing of this class action lawsuit indicates that affected consumers are seeking further recourse and compensation for the perceived impact of the device failures.
The legal proceedings are still in their early stages. As the case progresses through the court system, further filings, discovery, and potential settlement negotiations or trial proceedings will likely occur. This lawsuit underscores the significant responsibility manufacturers have to ensure the safety and reliability of their medical devices and highlights the importance of consumer protection in the healthcare industry. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Philips and potentially set precedents for future product liability litigation involving medical devices.
21-1428 – Yu v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
govinfo.gov District CourtWestern District of Pennsylvania published ’21-1428 – Yu v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al’ at 2025-08- 01 21:46. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.