German Parliament Questions Transparency and Human Rights in Uganda Development Aid,Drucksachen


German Parliament Questions Transparency and Human Rights in Uganda Development Aid

Berlin, Germany – July 3, 2025 – A significant parliamentary inquiry, designated as Drucksachen 21/745, has been officially published today by the German Bundestag, raising critical questions regarding the transparency, effectiveness, and justification of Germany’s development cooperation with Uganda. The inquiry specifically addresses concerns arising from documented human rights violations within the East African nation.

Published on July 3, 2025, at 10:00 AM, this “Kleine Anfrage” (Minor Inquiry) signals a growing parliamentary interest in scrutinizing the ethical implications and tangible outcomes of German development assistance. The document, titled “Kleine Anfrage Transparenz, Effektivität und Rechtfertigung der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit mit Uganda angesichts dokumentierter Menschenrechtsverletzungen (PDF),” underscores a commitment to ensuring that German taxpayers’ funds are utilized responsibly and in alignment with fundamental human rights principles.

The inquiry, submitted by members of the Bundestag, seeks detailed information from the German government on how it assesses the impact of its development projects in Uganda, particularly in light of reports of human rights abuses. It is understood that parliamentarians are keen to understand the mechanisms in place to monitor the human rights situation on the ground and how these findings influence the continuation, modification, or even cessation of specific aid programs.

Key areas likely to be addressed in the inquiry include:

  • Transparency of Aid Allocation: The extent to which the allocation and use of development funds in Uganda are transparent and publicly accessible.
  • Effectiveness of Programs: An evaluation of the actual impact and success of German development initiatives in achieving their stated goals, considering the broader socio-political context.
  • Justification of Continued Cooperation: The rationale behind maintaining development partnerships with Uganda when documented human rights violations are a concern, and the criteria used to make these decisions.
  • Due Diligence and Risk Assessment: The processes employed by the German government to conduct due diligence on its partners in Uganda and to assess the human rights risks associated with its involvement.
  • Human Rights Safeguards: The specific measures and safeguards implemented to prevent German development aid from inadvertently supporting or legitimizing entities responsible for human rights violations.
  • Accountability Mechanisms: The avenues for accountability for both German implementing agencies and Ugandan partner organizations in cases of misconduct or human rights breaches.

The publication of this inquiry highlights a growing trend in parliamentary oversight, where development cooperation is increasingly viewed not just through the lens of economic or geopolitical benefit, but also through the critical framework of human rights and ethical considerations. As the German government prepares to respond to these detailed questions, the outcome is anticipated to shed further light on the complexities of providing aid in environments where human rights challenges persist, and to inform future policy decisions regarding Germany’s engagement with Uganda.


21/745: Kleine Anfrage Transparenz, Effektivität und Rechtfertigung der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit mit Uganda angesichts dokumentierter Menschenrechtsverletzungen (PDF)


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


Drucksachen published ’21/745: Kleine Anfrage Transparenz, Effektivität und Rechtfertigung der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit mit Uganda angesichts dokumentierter Menschenrechtsverletzungen (PDF)’ at 2025-07-03 10:00. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment