Here is a detailed article about the Congressional disapproval of the Northern Long-Eared Bat rule, presented in a polite and informative tone:
Congress Disapproves Rule on Northern Long-Eared Bat Status
In a significant development concerning wildlife conservation policy, Congress has formally disapproved a rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) that addressed the endangered and threatened status of the Northern Long-Eared Bat. This action, taken under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code, signifies a notable intervention by lawmakers in the regulatory process.
The rule in question, published by the FWS on January 15, 2025, at 7:25 PM, aimed to alter or affirm the protections afforded to the Northern Long-Eared Bat, a species that has faced considerable challenges due to habitat loss and the devastating effects of white-nose syndrome. The specific details of the FWS rule and the precise nature of the congressional disapproval will become clearer as the legislative process unfolds and further information is released.
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) provides a mechanism for Congress to review and, if it chooses, overturn regulations issued by federal agencies. For a CRA resolution of disapproval to become law, it must be passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then be signed by the President, or the President’s veto must be overridden by a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress.
The decision to disapprove the FWS rule suggests that a majority in Congress may have had concerns regarding the rule’s scope, implementation, or its potential impacts on various stakeholders. These concerns could range from economic considerations related to land use and development to differing scientific interpretations or the effectiveness of the proposed conservation measures.
The Northern Long-Eared Bat is a species that has been a focus of conservation efforts for many years. Its listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) often carries implications for activities that could affect its habitat, such as logging, construction, and energy development. This disapproval signifies a pause in the FWS’s intended regulatory approach for this species, potentially necessitating further review and consultation.
As this situation evolves, further details regarding the specific objections raised by Congress and the subsequent steps to be taken by the FWS will be of considerable interest to conservationists, industry stakeholders, and the public alike. The future of protection for the Northern Long-Eared Bat will likely depend on ongoing dialogue and potential revisions to the FWS’s approach in light of congressional feedback.
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
www.govinfo.gov published ‘S.J. Res. 24 (ENR) – Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat.’ at 2025-01-15 19:25. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.