Canada Challenges US Steel and Aluminum Duties at the WTO
On March 13, 2025, Canada officially initiated a dispute complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO) against the United States regarding its duties on steel and aluminum imports. This move signals a renewed effort by Canada to challenge these tariffs, which have been a source of friction between the two long-standing trading partners for years.
What are these duties and why are they in place?
The duties in question were initially imposed by the US under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. This section allows the US President to impose trade restrictions on imports if they are deemed a threat to national security. Under this justification, the US imposed tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum from various countries, including Canada, back in 2018. While the US eventually lifted these duties on Canada and Mexico in 2019, new iterations and restrictions have since been implemented, keeping the issue simmering.
Why is Canada challenging these duties now?
While previous versions of these tariffs were also disputed, Canada’s latest complaint likely stems from recent changes or reimpositions of restrictions on steel and aluminum imports by the US. Although the specific details of the targeted measures aren’t detailed in the initial WTO announcement, they are likely perceived by Canada as:
- Unjustified: Canada argues that these duties lack a legitimate national security justification. They maintain that Canadian steel and aluminum exports pose no threat to US national security and instead are crucial components in the integrated North American supply chain.
- Discriminatory: Canada could be claiming that the duties unfairly target Canadian products, giving an advantage to domestic US producers or imports from other countries not subject to the same tariffs.
- Inconsistent with WTO rules: Canada’s complaint likely argues that the US actions violate the WTO’s rules on trade, including the principle of non-discrimination and the requirements for imposing trade restrictions based on national security concerns.
What does this WTO dispute mean?
Initiating a WTO dispute is a formal process. It begins with a request for consultations between Canada and the US. This is the first step in attempting to resolve the issue amicably. If consultations fail to produce a mutually agreeable solution within 60 days, Canada can request the establishment of a WTO panel to hear the case.
- Consultations: These are direct negotiations between Canada and the US to try to resolve the issue bilaterally. Experts from both sides will present their arguments and attempt to find common ground.
- Panel Review: If consultations fail, a panel of three independent trade experts will be appointed by the WTO to review the evidence and arguments presented by both sides. The panel will issue a report containing its findings and recommendations.
- Appeals: Either Canada or the US can appeal the panel’s decision to the WTO’s Appellate Body. However, the Appellate Body is currently non-functional due to a lack of appointments by WTO member states. This means that a panel report, if appealed, could essentially be in legal limbo.
- Compliance: If the WTO ultimately rules against the US, the US will be expected to bring its measures into compliance with WTO rules. If it fails to do so, Canada could be authorized by the WTO to impose retaliatory tariffs on US exports.
What are the potential implications?
This dispute has significant implications for both Canada and the US:
- Trade Relations: The dispute could further strain trade relations between the two countries.
- Supply Chains: The duties can disrupt integrated supply chains, increasing costs for businesses in both countries.
- Economic Impact: The duties and potential retaliatory tariffs can negatively impact specific industries, such as steel and aluminum producers and manufacturers that rely on these materials.
- WTO Authority: The dispute is another test of the WTO’s effectiveness, especially considering the current challenges facing the organization, including the non-functional Appellate Body.
In conclusion:
Canada’s initiation of a WTO dispute against the US steel and aluminum duties underscores the ongoing trade tensions between the two countries. The dispute process could take months, if not years, to resolve and the ultimate outcome will depend on the WTO’s rulings and the willingness of both countries to comply with those rulings. This development warrants close monitoring by businesses, policymakers, and anyone interested in international trade relations. It highlights the importance of adhering to agreed-upon trade rules and the potential consequences of trade disputes.
Canada initiates WTO dispute complaint regarding US steel and aluminium duties
The AI has delivered the news.
The following question was used to generate the response from Google Gemini:
At 2025-03-13 17:00, ‘Canada initiates WTO dispute complaint regarding US steel and aluminium duties’ was published a ccording to WTO. Please write a detailed article with related information in an easy-to-understand manner.
22