Landmark Case Filed: GRAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims,govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims


Landmark Case Filed: GRAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims

Washington D.C. – A significant legal development has emerged from the United States Court of Federal Claims, with the filing of a case titled GRAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. The official publication of this case, dated August 20, 2025, at 9:22 PM, marks a new chapter in a matter brought before this specialized federal court.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims is known for its unique jurisdiction, primarily handling monetary claims against the U.S. government. This includes cases arising from government contracts, constitutional takings, and importantly, matters related to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Given the parties involved in this newly published case – an individual identified as GRAY and the Secretary of Health and Human Services – it is highly probable that this litigation pertains to the vaccine compensation program.

While specific details of the allegations and the nature of the claim are not immediately available in the preliminary announcement, the filing of such a case signifies a claimant’s pursuit of redress. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established in 1986, provides a pathway for individuals who have suffered serious side effects from covered vaccines to receive compensation without the need to prove negligence in a traditional court setting. Instead, claimants must demonstrate that a vaccine listed on the program’s table caused their injury.

The involvement of the Secretary of Health and Human Services as the respondent indicates the federal government’s role in administering and defending claims under this program. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through its Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), oversees the program, including processing claims and making payments.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims plays a crucial role in adjudicating these claims when they cannot be resolved through the administrative process. Judges at this court hear evidence, review medical records, and make determinations regarding the merits of each petition. The outcome of cases like GRAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES can have a profound impact on individuals seeking compensation for vaccine-related injuries and can also contribute to the ongoing understanding and evolution of vaccine safety and compensation policies.

As this case progresses through the legal system, further information regarding its specifics will likely become publicly accessible through official court dockets and publications. This filing represents a commitment to the legal avenues available for individuals who believe they have been harmed and are seeking a resolution through the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.


1:23-vv-00461 – GRAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov United States Courtof Federal Claims published ‘1:23-vv-00461 – GRAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES’ at 2025-08-20 21:22. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment