Unmasking the Digital Realm: Court Orders Disclosure in Online Infringement Case,govinfo.gov District CourtEastern District of New York


Unmasking the Digital Realm: Court Orders Disclosure in Online Infringement Case

In a development shedding light on the complexities of online copyright enforcement, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has issued an order concerning the case of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 67.243.192.171. This order, published on August 12, 2025, marks a step in the ongoing efforts by copyright holders to identify individuals allegedly involved in the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material online.

The legal action brought forth by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, a company known for its involvement in copyright litigation, targets an individual identified solely by their assigned IP address, 67.243.192.171. This approach is common in cases where the identity of the alleged infringer is initially unknown, and the legal process aims to “unmask” the subscriber associated with the specific IP address in question.

While the specifics of the alleged infringement are not detailed in the public docket entry, such cases typically revolve around allegations of downloading, sharing, or distributing copyrighted content without proper authorization. The use of IP addresses as the initial identifier underscores the challenges faced by copyright holders in policing digital piracy, as online activities can often be conducted anonymously.

The court’s order signifies a procedural step where the plaintiff has sought and, in this instance, been granted permission to pursue further action to ascertain the identity of the subscriber linked to the aforementioned IP address. This often involves a “John Doe” summons, which allows for the service of legal documents on an unidentified party, enabling the plaintiff to then request information from Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

ISPs, holding records of IP address assignments and their corresponding customer information, are typically the key to identifying the individual behind an IP address. Obtaining this subscriber information requires a court order, ensuring a legal framework is followed and protecting user privacy to a degree.

This case, like many similar ones across the country, highlights the ongoing legal and technological battles surrounding intellectual property rights in the digital age. Copyright holders are actively seeking to protect their content from unauthorized distribution, while legal systems grapple with balancing these rights with issues of privacy and due process for internet users.

The outcome of this particular case will depend on a variety of factors, including the evidence presented by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, and the subsequent legal proceedings that will unfold once the subscriber’s identity is potentially revealed. It serves as a reminder of the legal responsibilities that come with online activity and the mechanisms in place for addressing alleged copyright infringement in the virtual space.


25-4227 – Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.243.192.171


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov District CourtEastern District of New York published ’25-4227 – Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.243.192.171′ at 2025-08-12 22:04. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant in formation. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment