Here’s an article about the Korben.info post, presented in a polite and informative tone:
Emerging Concerns: “Deadbots” – When AI Gives Voice to the Departed, Driven by Profit
A recent publication on the popular tech blog Korben.info, titled “Deadbots – Quand l’IA fait parler les morts contre des dollars,” published on August 27, 2025, at 12:40 PM, sheds light on a rapidly developing and ethically complex area of artificial intelligence: the creation of “deadbots.” This article raises significant questions about the commercialization of digital representations of deceased individuals and the potential implications for grieving families and societal norms.
The term “deadbot” refers to an AI-powered chatbot or virtual avatar that is trained on the digital footprint of a deceased person. This digital footprint can include text messages, emails, social media posts, voice recordings, and even videos. The goal is to create a system that can mimic the deceased’s communication style, personality, and even conversational patterns, allowing loved ones to interact with what feels like a digital echo of their departed friend or family member.
Korben.info’s article highlights the burgeoning commercial aspect of this technology. It suggests that companies are increasingly exploring ways to monetize these “deadbots,” framing them as a novel service for those struggling with loss. The article points towards a future where individuals might actively invest in creating their own “digital afterlife” or where services could be offered to resurrect the digital persona of loved ones for a fee.
While the intention behind such technologies might be to offer comfort and a sense of continued connection, the article implicitly, and at times explicitly, raises serious ethical considerations. These include:
- Consent and Dignity: The deceased cannot consent to their digital persona being replicated and commercialized. This raises profound questions about respecting their privacy and dignity even after death.
- Grief and Emotional Manipulation: The ability to interact with an AI mimicking a loved one could, for some, hinder the natural grieving process. There’s also a concern that these services could be perceived as exploitative, preying on vulnerable individuals during a difficult time.
- Data Privacy and Security: The vast amounts of personal data required to train these AI models raise significant privacy and security concerns. Who controls this data, and how is it protected?
- The Nature of Identity and Reality: As AI becomes more sophisticated, the lines between genuine human connection and artificial interaction blur. The article prompts reflection on what it truly means to remember and honor someone, and whether such digital replicas can truly fulfill that purpose.
- Financial Incentives: The “contre des dollars” (for dollars) aspect of the title is particularly noteworthy. It underscores the potential for profit to drive the development and deployment of these sensitive technologies, potentially overshadowing ethical considerations.
The publication on Korben.info serves as an important early warning and a catalyst for discussion. As artificial intelligence continues its rapid advancement, it is crucial for society to engage in thoughtful dialogue about the ethical boundaries of its application, particularly when it intersects with fundamental human experiences like death and remembrance. The emergence of “deadbots” and their potential commercialization demands careful consideration and proactive ethical frameworks to ensure that technological progress serves humanity’s best interests.
Deadbots – Quand l’IA fait parler les morts contre des dollars
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
Korben published ‘Deadbots – Quand l’IA fait parler les morts contre des dollars’ at 2025-08-27 12:40. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.