Here is a detailed article about the news from Musicman.co.jp, presented in a polite tone with relevant information:
EU’s Proposed AI Code of Conduct Faces Strong Criticism from Creative Industries
Tokyo, Japan – August 7, 2025 – A significant development in the ongoing dialogue surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on creative industries has emerged, with a coalition of international organizations, including the IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) and other creative sector alliances, strongly condemning the European Union’s (EU) recently proposed Code of Conduct for Generative AI. The organizations have voiced their deep disappointment, labeling the proposed guidelines as a “betrayal” of the original intent of intellectual property law.
The news, reported by Musicman.co.jp, highlights a growing chasm between the EU’s approach to regulating AI and the concerns of artists, musicians, writers, and other creators worldwide. The IFPI, representing the global recorded music industry, along with other prominent creative industry federations, has issued a firm statement articulating their grievances.
At the heart of the criticism lies the perceived inadequacy of the proposed Code of Conduct in safeguarding the rights and livelihoods of creators in the face of rapidly advancing AI technologies. The organizations argue that the current proposals fail to adequately address crucial issues such as the unauthorized use of copyrighted works in AI training data, the lack of transparency regarding AI-generated content, and the potential for AI to devalue human creative labor.
A spokesperson for the IFPI stated, “We are deeply concerned that the EU’s proposed Code of Conduct for Generative AI does not go far enough to protect the foundational principles of intellectual property rights. These rights are essential for fostering innovation and ensuring that creators can continue to invest their time, talent, and resources into producing the cultural works that enrich our lives.”
The statement further elaborates that the proposed guidelines are seen as undermining the very essence of copyright law, which is designed to provide creators with control over their works and a means to benefit from their creative endeavors. The organizations contend that allowing AI systems to freely process and learn from vast amounts of copyrighted material without proper attribution, consent, or compensation constitutes a significant infringement and a deviation from the legal frameworks established to protect creativity.
“This proposal feels like a betrayal of the legal frameworks that have been painstakingly built over decades to ensure fairness and reward for creative work,” the spokesperson continued. “We believe that a robust and effective Code of Conduct must prioritize the rights of human creators and establish clear guidelines for the ethical and legal development and deployment of AI in the creative sphere.”
The creative industry coalition is calling for a more comprehensive and creator-centric approach from the EU. They are urging policymakers to consider stronger provisions for licensing and compensation for the use of copyrighted material in AI training, as well as to implement clear labeling mechanisms for AI-generated content to prevent misattribution and ensure consumer transparency.
This strong opposition from a significant bloc of the global creative industries signals a challenging road ahead for the EU’s AI regulatory efforts. The outcome of these discussions will have far-reaching implications for how artificial intelligence is developed and utilized across all sectors, with particular emphasis on ensuring a sustainable and equitable future for creative professionals. The industry remains committed to engaging in constructive dialogue to find solutions that foster both technological advancement and the protection of human creativity.
IFPIなどクリエイティブ産業の連合、EUの汎用AI行動規範を非難「法律本来の意図に対する『裏切り』」
AI has delivered the news.
The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.
音楽業界総合情報サイト published ‘IFPIなどクリエイティブ産業の連合、EUの汎用AI行動規範を非難「法律本来の意図に対する『裏切り』」’ at 2025-08-07 09:03. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.