Landmark Case in Digital Privacy: Court Orders Disclosure of Subscriber Information Linked to IP Address,govinfo.gov District CourtDistrict of Minnesota


Landmark Case in Digital Privacy: Court Orders Disclosure of Subscriber Information Linked to IP Address

In a significant development for digital privacy and intellectual property rights, a federal court in Minnesota has ordered the disclosure of subscriber information associated with a specific IP address. The case, Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 68.168.161.196, was published on July 29, 2025, by the U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov), originating from the District of Minnesota.

This ruling, issued by the District Court, addresses a common challenge faced by copyright holders and content creators: identifying individuals who allegedly infringe on their intellectual property rights online. Strike 3 Holdings LLC, a company known for its copyright enforcement efforts, brought this action seeking to unmask the identity of a subscriber linked to the IP address 68.168.161.196, which they allege was used in connection with the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material.

The court’s decision to grant the request for subscriber information, often referred to as a “John Doe” order or a subpoena under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), is a critical step in allowing copyright holders to pursue legal action against alleged infringers. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) typically hold the records linking IP addresses to their customers. For legal proceedings to advance, courts must compel these ISPs to release such subscriber data.

While the specific details of Strike 3 Holdings LLC’s allegations are not fully elaborated in the public record of this initial order, these types of cases typically involve claims of digital piracy, where copyrighted films, music, or other media are shared without permission. The ability to identify the responsible parties is essential for enforcing copyright law and deterring future infringement.

This ruling highlights the ongoing tension between the desire to protect intellectual property and the right to online privacy. Courts often balance these competing interests, requiring a credible showing of infringement before ordering the disclosure of personal subscriber information. The process generally involves a sworn affidavit from the copyright holder detailing the alleged infringement and the evidence linking it to the specific IP address.

The broader implications of this case could be far-reaching. It underscores the legal mechanisms available to copyright owners to combat online infringement and signals that individuals engaging in such activities may be identifiable. For internet users, it serves as a reminder that online activities, particularly those that may violate copyright laws, can be traced back to their internet service subscriptions.

The publication of this order on govinfo.gov ensures transparency in the legal process and provides a public record of the court’s actions. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, legal frameworks for addressing online copyright infringement remain a crucial area of law, and cases like this contribute to the ongoing dialogue and development of jurisprudence in this field.


25-2380 – Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 68.168.161.196


AI has delivered the news.

The answer to the following question is obtained from Google Gemini.


govinfo.gov District CourtDistrict of Minnesota published ’25-2380 – Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 68.168.161.196′ at 2025-07-29 20:29. Please write a detailed article about this news in a polite tone with relevant information. Please reply in English with the article only.

Leave a Comment