What’s Happening?,Congressional Bills


Okay, let’s break down this Congressional action regarding an EPA rule on rubber tire manufacturing emissions.

What’s Happening?

Congress is attempting to disapprove an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule regarding air pollution from rubber tire manufacturing plants. This disapproval is being done through a “Congressional Review Act” (CRA) resolution. The specific resolution is H.J. Res. 61 (House Joint Resolution 61).

Breaking Down the Jargon:

  • H.J. Res. 61(ENR): This is a “House Joint Resolution” number 61, and the “(ENR)” likely means “Enrolled,” indicating it has passed both the House and Senate in the same form and is ready for the President’s signature (or veto). However, the “Providing for congressional disapproval” part is crucial.
  • Congressional Review Act (CRA): This is a law that allows Congress to review and, if it chooses, disapprove new regulations issued by federal agencies like the EPA. It’s a way for Congress to check the power of the executive branch in rulemaking.
  • Chapter 8 of Title 5, United States Code: This refers to the specific section of U.S. law that outlines the procedures of the Congressional Review Act.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The U.S. government agency responsible for protecting human health and the environment. It sets and enforces environmental regulations.
  • National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): These are regulations under the Clean Air Act that specifically target hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). HAPs are known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects.
  • Rubber Tire Manufacturing: The industry involved in producing tires for vehicles. This industry uses various chemicals and processes that can release pollutants into the air.

The EPA Rule in Question:

The specific EPA rule that Congress is trying to disapprove is related to “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants” from rubber tire manufacturing facilities. Without the full text of the rule, it’s difficult to know exactly what the EPA is regulating. However, it would likely address things like:

  • Types of Pollutants: The rule likely sets limits on emissions of specific hazardous air pollutants. These pollutants could include things like benzene, butadiene, styrene, and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These are used in the production of synthetic rubber and other tire components.
  • Emission Limits: The rule would set maximum permissible levels of these pollutants that can be released by tire manufacturing plants.
  • Control Technologies: The rule might require tire manufacturers to install and operate specific technologies to reduce emissions. This could include things like scrubbers, filters, or other air pollution control equipment.
  • Monitoring and Reporting: The rule would likely require plants to monitor their emissions and report them to the EPA.
  • Work Practice Standards: The rule might dictate how certain processes must be conducted to minimize emissions.

Why is Congress Trying to Disapprove It?

There are a few common reasons why Congress might try to use the Congressional Review Act to block an agency rule:

  • Economic Concerns: Industry groups often argue that new regulations are too costly to comply with and will harm the economy or make their businesses less competitive. They might claim the benefits of the rule don’t justify the costs.
  • Overreach: Some members of Congress might believe the EPA is exceeding its authority and that the rule is an overreach of federal power. They might argue that the regulation infringes on states’ rights or goes beyond what the law intended.
  • Technical Arguments: Critics might argue that the EPA’s science or analysis used to justify the rule is flawed or that the rule is technically infeasible.
  • Political Opposition: Sometimes, the disapproval is simply a matter of political disagreement with the administration in power and its environmental policies.
  • Process Concerns: Some might argue that the EPA didn’t follow proper procedures in developing the rule (e.g., not providing enough opportunity for public comment).

What Happens Next?

The CRA provides a specific timeline and process. Key points include:

  1. Congressional Consideration: Congress has a limited time (typically 60 legislative days) to pass a resolution of disapproval.

  2. Presidential Action: If the resolution passes both the House and Senate, it goes to the President.

  3. Veto Power: The President can veto the resolution. If the President vetoes it, Congress needs a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to override the veto and disapprove the rule.

Consequences of Disapproval:

If Congress successfully disapproves the EPA rule:

  • The rule is blocked. It cannot go into effect.
  • The EPA is barred from issuing a “substantially similar” rule unless Congress specifically authorizes them to do so through new legislation. This is a significant consequence of using the CRA.

Importance of Context

To fully understand this, you’d need to know:

  • The specific details of the EPA rule: What pollutants are being regulated? What are the emission limits? What control technologies are required?
  • The arguments for and against the rule: What are the EPA’s justifications for the rule? What are the industry’s concerns? What do environmental groups say?
  • The political context: Which party controls the House, Senate, and Presidency? This will influence the likelihood of the resolution passing and/or surviving a veto.

In summary, H.J. Res. 61 is an attempt by Congress to block an EPA rule aimed at reducing hazardous air pollution from rubber tire manufacturing plants. This is done through the Congressional Review Act, which gives Congress a powerful tool to check agency regulations. The outcome will depend on the political dynamics and the specific arguments for and against the rule. Because the bill is enrolled, the next step would be Presidential signature or veto. If signed, the bill becomes law. If vetoed, Congress has the opportunity to override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both chambers.


H.J. Res.61(ENR) – Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing.


The AI has delivered the news.

The following question was used to generate the response from Google Gemini:

At 2025-05-08 04:24, ‘H.J. Res.61(ENR) – Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing.’ was published according to Congressional Bills. Please write a detailed article with related information in an easy-to-understand manner. Please answer in English.


1585

Leave a Comment